
PropPocket · Buyer guide
Rent or buy: what growth would this home need?
Buying does not win just because rent is money you do not get back: interest, duty and running costs also leave your pocket. Compare the two paths with the same starting cash and household spending. RentVest estimates the annual property growth needed for buying to finish ahead over your chosen period.
By PropPocket · Reviewed 16 October 2026 · Figures in Australian dollars
Test my rent-or-buy assumptionsA break-even question, not a price forecast
Illustration: $1,000,000 NSW home, 20% deposit, 6.1% loan over 30 years, $10,550 annual ownership costs, $3,600 buying-cost allowances and rent of $750 a week for a similar home. Hold for 10 years; assume 7% total share returns, 3% annual rent and cost inflation, a 3% share-income component, and 2.5% selling costs.
With these inputs, the home needs about 3.9% growth a year for the two paths to finish level.
Calculated using RentVest’s engine and tax assumptions as at 16 October 2026, including the scenario’s 37% marginal rate plus selected Medicare levy. This is a hypothetical return assumption, not an expected return. Buying can lose; the break-even changes when you change costs, tax, investment discipline or the horizon. Your live result may differ as rules, defaults and the assumed purchase date change.
Make both sides comparable
- The buyer uses deposit, duty and buying costs; the renter starts by investing that same cash.
- Each month, whichever path costs less invests the specified share of the difference. Principal repayments build equity but still use cash.
- Compare what is left after the selected period, including selling costs, outstanding debt and the modelled tax on investments.
- Use rent for a comparable home and realistic holding costs. Avoid counting building insurance twice when strata already covers it.
Tax modelling is simplified and assumes the selected residence and investor settings apply. Main-residence exemptions and investment tax depend on circumstances. Check the live assumptions and official guidance rather than treat this as an individual tax assessment.
Try flat prices, a fall and higher rates
In RentVest, set growth to 0%, then test an early 10% fall and a 1 percentage point rate rise. Also reduce the share of the monthly difference invested if you would spend some of it. A result that depends on one optimistic assumption deserves a closer look.
The home mode compares buying to live in with renting and investing in shares. Investment mode compares an investment property with shares. Neither mode is a full comparison of buying a home to live in versus renting elsewhere while owning a different investment property.
Use the share control to keep the inputs with the result. The comparison does not tell you whether housing security, flexibility or a particular location matters more to you.
Sources and assumptions
- ASIC Moneysmart: purchase and ownership costs
- Moneysmart: repayments and rate sensitivity
- ATO: capital gains tax guidance
- NSW duty calculation and the cash needed to buy
- RentVest: editable assumptions, weekly budget and detailed results
The example does not model your personal income, future loan approval, moving costs, all tax exceptions or a guaranteed investment return.